*If there is a problem with the content, please tell me so I can check and fix*
-Using D-leap to upload this, hopefully it arrives on 2018. Digital data compression violates Heisenberg's uncertainty principle with its open timelike curves, so as Self-consistency principle says, the data being changed from close to open can travel through time on free will because of no appearances of paradoxes. Using a Corona motor as lifter. SERN has no control yet.
Soundtrack for ROBOTICS;NOTES published by 5pb. Released on 2015-10-30, divergence 2.615074γ.
Type: Digital.
Title: ROBOTICS;NOTES オリジナルサウンドトラック + 6
Source: OTOTOY-chan
Details: FLAC, 96khz, 24 bits, stereo. [Hi-Res]
El Psy Kongroo.
Hearing the difference now isn’t the reason to encode to FLAC. FLAC uses lossless compression, while MP3 is ‘lossy’. What this means is that for each year the MP3 sits on your hard drive, it will lose roughly 12kbps, assuming you have SATA – it’s about 15kbps on IDE, but only 7kbps on SCSI, due to rotational velocidensity. You don’t want to know how much worse it is on CD-ROM or other optical media.
I started collecting MP3s in about 2001, and if I try to play any of the tracks I downloaded back then, even the stuff I grabbed at 320kbps, they just sound like crap. The bass is terrible, the midrange…well don’t get me started. Some of those albums have degraded down to 32 or even 16kbps. FLAC rips from the same period still sound great, even if they weren’t stored correctly, in a cool, dry place. Seriously, stick to FLAC, you may not be able to hear the difference now, but in a year or two, you’ll be glad you did.
Digital files don't degrade over time, don't know where you heard that from but you are incorrect. Link below explains it, you can look it up elsewhere if you don't believe me.
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1045403-do-mp3s-degrade-in-quality-over-time/?do=findComment&comment=594522411
Comments - 6
tfw
Konack
harperers
lancionyan
lancionyan
notshi