Why do you put SmugCat in the name when you did your own edits of it?

@CheekyKoala Just tell OP that releasing a torrent under someone else's tag makes it look like OP is claiming direct affiliation with the group rather than asking a question that beats around the bush.

> moozzi2 no thanks. smugcat's web video is better than that garbage.

@CheekyKoala: I appreciate your concern. First, the torrent description included clarifies that there is no affiliation with the said group. Second, I have many other releases and followed similar naming style and I wish you'd addressed your concern before. I fixed the torrent title here. If you think this is fine, I will fix other releases as well. Thanks. @ChaoXide: This torrent contains only subtitles, but no videos. I used moozzi2's raws for editing and you're free to go with the web rips anyways.

>This torrent contains only subtitles, but no videos. I used moozzi2’s raws for editing It contains altered typesetting, too. moozzi2's raws destroy colors. I mean, it's unusable with proper raws.

Don't put other people's tags in your titles or filenames if those are not the releases of those other groups. This is literally in the rules.

Honoraries: restored moozzi2 raws: used tags: mishandled oh yea, it's release time

@Kamiyan93: The episode titles are the only signs typeset here and if you check those you'll notice the subs are usable for other raws too. Just to add that in fact Smugcat's "next episode titles" were not portable to BD raws due to time change and the way that they coded it. It's a bit hard to explain though. @LCE: Feel free to make your own release.

You can always try using the old retrofit naming scheme e.g, [your_tag]Goblin Slayer[original_script], which clearly shows the source for the script and also tells you they have been modified !

https://nyaa.iss.one/view/1169232#com-10

This was clear to me but some people don't check things and just make general conclusions. > moozzi2’s raws destroy colors. Yes and no. He changes (not destroy) the colors for some of his releases, but not for all. Click on the image bellow to see a full size comparison: [](https://i.imgur.com/M1ipBwa.png) The example above is from his own "Before" and "After" samples of this show. The red pixels indicate major difference. So, you see that the flat areas are matching (with some scattered noisy differences) while the lines and edges are significantly altered (less blurry and more vivid). I'm not advocating anyone's work, but I always tried to be polite when addressing their work and effort. Don't you have a same opinion?