You could remux the audios and avoid x2 waste space? 200-300MB is nothing.
Thanks, i was looking for this.
PS: x264 or x265? my pc is slow. English subs?
zrdb what makes you say that? MediaInfo shows it's straight out of MakeMKV.
Without a BDMV/ISO of the bonus disc (can only find dead DDL links) it's safe to assume they _did_ actually put the video on there twice, the audio tracks on both have the same source ID which I don't think is possible within the same m2ts file, `4352 (0x1100)`.
Evangelion 3.0 (-120min) You Can (Not) Redo. (2.0).mkv
https://files.catbox.moe/kl0rdy.txt
Evangelion 3.0 (-120min) You Can (Not) Redo. (5.1).mkv
https://files.catbox.moe/ixdx02.txt
-46h looks similar, no point in posting long MediaInfo twice.
The video streams aren't identical - you can demux them and try and hash them if you want. I doubt anyone would be able to tell the difference, since there's a sizable chunk of the video where the SSIM score is **1.00** and I didn't see it dip below **0.989** - admittedly useless since you can assign either as the "source" - point being, nearly identical, but still different video. Same source, different audio track, slightly lower maximum bitrate allotted to the video with 5.1 audio because `there are less bits available now and we have to stay under 40Mbps` _Technically_ the video track included with the Stereo audio might be higher quality, if `>size` automatically = `>quality` with whatever encoder they used when they authored the disc - but again, even pixel peeping wherever it scored lowest, I'd be arsed if I could tell either from the other. Even x264's output is non-deterministic by default.
Comments - 5
uberasian
ElderKai (uploader)
rocknard
zrdb
bood