bussy

Opus based

I'm so glad you went with Opus. Taylor Swift would never.

regrain.. did you add noise?

Hey @oZanderr, quick question: Do you think your Demon Slayer release will be seeded before Tanjiro masters a new breathing technique? 🤔 Because at this rate, we're all going to turn into demons from old age waiting for the swarm to finish. Might as well start practicing our Total Concentration Breathing to see it happen in this lifetime. 😂 Let's get that client online before Nezuko learns to speak in full sentences, alright? #WaitingForHashiraSneed 🗡️👹

@Nokou Yes, basically every competent encoder adds some grain. That doesn't mean that you're adding a noticeable ugly layer of noise on top of the source. It's mostly a light amount that is meant to blend with the source grain and cover up starved/inconsistent patches. It's also typically done after some denoising and highly configurable and adaptive depending on the situation.

Thank you mr OZR for this amazing release, i personally don't like grain because it feels like i'm watching a hollywood movie from the 20s, and when i combo the ants + the grain, the result is not nice.... that is why i malded so hard with mushoku, it felt like i was in egypt and my glasses were full of sandbut, but when my autobrr download your release....., i always make sure to abandon everything to watch it, even if it has grain, but i hate grain.....

Based release. Thanks @oZanderr!

Pog, didn't see this until now

I have a PhD in Digital Music Conservation from the University of Florida. I have to stress that the phenomenon known as "digital dust" is the real problem regarding conservation of music, and any other type of digital file. Digital files are stored in digital filing cabinets called "directories" which are prone to "digital dust" - slight bit alterations that happen now or then. Now, admittedly, in its ideal, pristine condition, a piece of musical work encoded in FLAC format contains more information than the same piece encoded in MP3, however, as the FLAC file is bigger, it accumulates, in fact, MORE digital dust than the MP3 file. Now you might say that the density of dust is the same. That would be a naive view. Since MP3 files are smaller, they can be much more easily stacked together and held in "drawers" called archive files (Zip, Rar, Lha, etc.) ; in such a configuration, their surface-to-volume ratio is minimized. Thus, they accumulate LESS digital dust and thus decay at a much slower rate than FLACs. All this is well-known in academia, alas the ignorant hordes just think that because it's bigger, it must be better. So over the past months there's been some discussion about the merits of lossy compression and the rotational velocidensity issue. I'm an audiophile myself and posses a vast collection of uncompressed audio files, but I do want to assure the casual low-bitrate users that their music library is quite safe. Being an audio engineer for over 21 years, I'm going to let you in on a little secret. While rotational velocidensity is indeed responsible for some deterioration of an unanchored file, there's a simple way of preventing this. Better still, there have been some reported cases of damaged files repairing themselves, although marginally so (about 1.7 percent for the .ogg format).

i want some tacos, @Reza27 can I get some please!?!?!

Sure thing man. Just give me your address and I'll be right over.

Thank you!