# 【Midnight Grand Orchestra】ー「Starpeggio」 --- ### 星街すいせい ／ 井上拓 ー Suisei Hoshimachi / Taku Inoue #### [FLAC 96kHz／24bit] --- [](https://postimg.cc/0r2XKZT4) follow the link for 2400x2400 artwork (iTunes) --- Midnight Grand Orchestra - Starpeggio | [2023-12-13] | 96000/24 stereo | WEB/OTOTOY ---|---|---|--- 01_01_Light The Light.flac | 3408 | 85382421 | `E04527AB4189566BB3F93DC975037342` 01_02_Moonlightspeed.flac | 3250 | 79247965 | `D487FF0AF35DD27FBBA09CBD4C2B690D` 01_03_Midnight Mission.flac | 3420 | 95881113 | `31CF365EE077FAE2FA3F543A470A14A1` 01_04_Igniter.flac | 3444 | 83467990 | `A726A67B85477D6EAC1AAEA8CD13B3A0` 01_05_Blackhole Dancehall.flac | 3512 | 85087182 | `D570DEE82226758B5F08EE43A026438C` 01_06_Starpeggio.flac | 2185 | 20867517 | `43F7F724F128B58CED90591431690086` 01_07_ソリロキー.flac | 3111 | 80423473 | `6B3E7B9BD5E1813A7A8C009AF8FC3B39` 01_08_夜を待つよ.flac | 3145 | 98274316 | `8832F44D40AB3EE50C914E17D2DFE6DA` `%filename_ext%` | `%bitrate%` | `%filesize%` | `$info(MD5)` --- If you're ~~as autistic as I am~~ curious about any difference between **this** and the Amazon rip that's on all the direct DL sites: **TL;DR Amazon had mixed sample rates & an extra 0.0065s of silence at the beginning of every track**. _That's it_. If you already had it, there's really no reason to get this again...unless you want your dog, dolphin, or pet bat to listen to tracks 2, 3, and 8. * Track 2 Moonlightspeed is only **44/16** on Amazon. The single was 96/24 elsewhere + That single and this album version don't match at all with a bit-compare but they sound the same... * Tracks 1, 4, 5, 6, 7 are identical* * there are extra null samples on Amazon, a full comparison log for Track 1 is below as an example * all 5 have the same `624 leading null samples` offset * Track 3 Midnight Mission and Track 8 Yoru Wo Matsu Yo are _both 48/24 on Amazon, **and** on their singles_ but 96/24 here * Amazon album and previously released singles match * `312 leading null samples` on Amazon for both It's always **exactly 6.5ms** of extra silence at the beginning on Amazon. `312/48000 == 624/96000 == 0.0065s`. Not sure if there's a technical reason for that or not, ~~maybe whatever ripper "they" use~~ it's such an arbitrary number though...don't care, already bored. --- fb2k bit-compare: > Differences found in compared tracks; **the tracks became identical after applying offset and truncating first/last samples.** > _Extra leading/trailing sections contained only null samples._ ```Comparing: "...\Starpeggio\01_01_Light The Light.flac" "...\Midnight Grand Orchestra - Starpeggio (Amazon)\01. Light The Light.flac" Differences found: length mismatch - 3:19.094458 vs 3:19.100958, 19113068 vs 19113692 samples. Compared 19113068 samples. Discarded last 624 samples containing non-null values from the longer file. Differences found within the compared range: 38085012 values, 0:00.170667 - 3:19.094448, peak: 1.884946 (+5.51 dBTP) at 2:21.071667, 2ch Channel difference peaks: 1.883662 (+5.50 dBTP) 1.884946 (+5.51 dBTP) File #1 peaks: 0.942967 (-0.51 dBTP) 0.942967 (-0.51 dBTP) File #2 peaks: 0.942967 (-0.51 dBTP) 0.942967 (-0.51 dBTP) Detected offset as 624 samples. Comparing again with corrected offset... Compared 19113068 samples, with offset of 624. Discarded 624 leading null samples from file #2. No differences in decoded data found within the compared range. Channel peaks: 0.942967 (-0.51 dBTP) 0.942967 (-0.51 dBTP) Total duration processed: 3:19.094 Time elapsed: 0:05.994 33.21x realtime ``` --- ## *Enjoy* #### - βøøδ